The Grape Identity Crisis //php get_posflags()?>
Posted on | March 11, 2010
![]()
Written by | admin
In the past month, I’ve been doing some work with our master grape list. I knew it was a super huge task, but the more I learned and dove into it, the bigger the project revealed itself to be. One of the huge issues with keeping content about wines clean and streamlined is that there are so many names for grapes that it’s tough and often confusing.
Some very common duplicates are Syrah and Shiraz; Pinot Grigio and Pinot Gris; Grenache and Garnacha. However, it by no means ends there (if it did, this would be easy!). Beyond that are many hundreds and thousands of duplicate names.
Let me introduce you to my good friend Muscat,the king of many, many, many names. On top of being called nearly everything under the sun, there are about 9 different varieties that actually take on a variation of the name Muscat and are different grapes. The rest of Muscat names are just synonyms. I have no problem with calling yourself Moscato in Italy, Muscat D’Alsace in France and Gelber Muskateller in Germany, but this all ends up creating confusion when you want to straighten out information.
So how should you handle grape names on your website? If you elect to make a distinction between wines named Syrah and wines named Shiraz, where do you stop? Keeping synonym names can often make it difficult to provide good navigation on your website that connects all grapes taking on different names. It’s easier with Syrah and Shiraz, but when you’re dealing with something like Muscat, it gets increasingly difficult and confusing.
Recently, we started implementing dynamic navigation that would allow customers to find the exact country, region or grape that they were searching for quite easily. From their initial search criteria, they can get more and more specific to find exactly what they want. However, it’s not always the most advantageous thing to list out all the grapes in your inventory for a customer to pick from. Left navigation or a drop down could be daunting to look at with so many options. It’s much easier for your customers to look at a list of the 10 most popular varietals. Certainly there will be specialty shoppers looking for wines made from varietals that are less common but the bulk of shoppers will be most interested in the top 10-20 grapes and a full list can be provided on a secondary page.
Whether the navigation is provided on the left hand side or via drop down menus depends on the layout and feel of your site. It’s often a case-by-case decision as to what works best. Once that is determined, there is more to consider, such as levels of navigation where there are parent grapes with others listed below them. Take for instance wines made with a Bordeaux blend. That could be a parent option in your navigation but Cabernet Sauvignon, Merlot and the other Bordeaux grapes could be listed below, allowing your customer to further customize their search results.
Overall, the process of thinning the herd of grape names and adding dynamic navigation that allows for an easier customer experience is something to shoot for and implement. The process could garner more positive experiences, more sales, and even more repeat customers.
Comments
2 Responses to “The Grape Identity Crisis”
March 12th, 2010 @ 9:30 am
Sometimes there is no clear answer, but instead you look for the a solution you can live with.
On the dynamic navigation – first you only show varietals the store has in inventory (assume you do this). Second could you not map varietals like Syrah and Shiraz together (so they both appear but they pull the same results)?
If the varietal list is to long in the left nav, could you not just show the top 5 or 10 varietals and let the rest be found by free form search?
You probably have thought already about all of these suggestions.
March 15th, 2010 @ 4:47 pm
Thanks for the comment Andrew! I think you’re right–there is rarely a clear cut solution that provides the one and only way to go about the navigation issue.
We’re only displaying grapes in the dynamic navigation that the store has in stock, so that cuts down on extraneous information that isn’t relevant and that’s the first step in the right direction. I think your example with mapping the search results for Syrah and Shiraz is a good one and certainly an option. However, if we do shorten the left nav to show only the top 5-10 most popular grapes in the inventory, it might not be worth while to show the duplicate names for Syrah/Shiraz. I think that would depend heavily on the store’s goals, customers and their inventory.
Many of these options are up in the air and open for discussion with the individual stores that want to implement the dynamic navigation and I think that’s what makes this a difficult issue. There are standard settings that we can create, but each store has different goals and different inventory so they’re likely to want to highlight different attributes in their navigation.